4.4 Article

Evaluation of allelic alterations in short tandem repeats in papillary thyroid cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1164

Keywords

laser capture microdissection; mutation; papillary thyroid cancer; short tandem repeats

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019PH039]
  2. Research Fund for Lin He's Academician Workstation of New Medicine and Clinical Translation in Jining Medical University [JYHL2018MS13, JYHL2018MS14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Malignant tissue samples may be the only source of biological material for forensic investigations, including individual identification or paternity testing; however, such samples may lead to uncertainties due to frequent genomic aberrations associated with tumors, including alterations of the short tandem repeat (STR) loci used for forensic casework. Methods Short tandem repeat loci routinely used in forensic analysis (n = 23) were analyzed in 68 surgically removed papillary thyroid cancer specimens. Tumor cells and normal stromal cells were separated by laser capture microdissection. Results Four kinds of changes were detected between normal and tumor tissues: partial loss of heterozygosity (pLOH), complete loss of heterozygosity, an additional allele, and a new allele not found in normal tissue. These changes were distributed across 20 of the tested STRs, with no mutations in VWA, D16S539, or Penta D. The most frequently affected locus was D2S1338, and the most frequent type of alteration was pLOH. Samples from patients aged 40-59 years exhibited the highest frequencies of STR variation. Conclusion Our results suggest that great care should be taken in the evaluation of DNA typing results obtained from malignant tissues, particularly when no normal tissue reference samples are available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available