4.6 Article

Costs and benefits of agricultural ammonia emission abatement options for compliance with European air quality regulations

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-019-0275-0

Keywords

Ammonia emissions; WRF; Chem; Value of statistical life; PM2; 5 in Europe; Premature mortality; CAP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In Europe, ammonia (NH3) emissions strongly contribute to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution and associated premature human mortality. The National Emission Ceilings Directive 2016/2284/EU has set an obligation for all European Union countries to reduce the NH3 emissions by 6%, relative to 2005, by 2020. This study aims to assess the costs and benefits of four NH3 emission abatement options for the compliance of the agricultural sector with the commitments of the European air quality regulatory framework. A regional atmospheric model (WRF/Chem) was used to assess the effects of regulating NH3 emissions reductions on PM2.5 concentrations over Europe. Non-market valuation techniques (value of statistical life) were used to monetize the associated health outcomes. Results We calculated that 16 out of the 28 EU member states exceeded their 2020 NH3 emission ceilings in 2016. The highest exceedances from the 2020 emission commitment level occurred in Latvia (15%), Germany (12%) and the UK (12%). Simulation of the required NH3 emission reduction by WRF/Chem showed that relatively large reductions in PM2.5 concentrations occur over central-western Europe and the UK. The largest health benefits (> 5% reduction in premature mortality) were found for Scandinavia. The economic benefit from avoided premature deaths over Europe amounts to 14,837 Meuro/year. The costs of four NH3 emission abatement options, where each would fully achieve the required emission reduction, range from 80 Meuro/year for low nitrogen feed to 3738 Meuro/year for low-emission animal housing, with covered manure storage (236 Meuro/year) and urea fertilizer application (253 Meuro/year), in between. Conclusion Our analysis indicates that the costs of compliance by the agricultural sector with the commitments of the European air quality regulations are much lower than the economic benefit. Thus, much more ambitious reduction commitments for NH3 emissions could be applied by the EU-28. The monetization of the health benefits of NH3 emission abatement policies and the assessment of the implementation costs can help policy-makers devise effective air pollution control programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available