4.6 Review

Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020367

Keywords

venous thromboembolism; cancer-associated venous thromboembolism; thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; neoplasms; anticoagulants; direct oral anticoagulants; coumarins; low molecular weight heparins

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent complication in ambulatory cancer patients. Despite the high risk, routine thromboprophylaxis is not recommended because of the high number needed to treat and the risk of bleeding. Two recent trials demonstrated that the number needed to treat can be reduced by selecting cancer patients at high risk for VTE with prediction scores, leading the latest guidelines to suggest such an approach in clinical practice. Yet, the interpretation of these trial results and the translation of the guideline recommendations to clinical practice may be less straightforward. In this clinically-oriented review, some of the controversies are addressed by focusing on the burden of VTE in cancer patients, discussing the performance of available risk assessment scores, and summarizing the findings of recent trials. This overview can help oncologists, hematologists, and vascular medicine specialists decide about thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available