4.6 Article

A metastable subproteome underlies inclusion formation in muscle proteinopathies

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0853-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R25NS070697, R21NS101588, R01AR068797, K24AR073317, R37AG026647, P01AG054407, R56AG059579, RF1AG057296]
  2. Daniel F. and Ada L. Rice Foundation
  3. Ruhr-University Bochum [FoRUM F755-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein aggregation is a pathological feature of neurodegenerative disorders. We previously demonstrated that protein inclusions in the brain are composed of supersaturated proteins, which are abundant and aggregation-prone, and form a metastable subproteome. It is not yet clear, however, whether this phenomenon is also associated with non-neuronal protein conformational disorders. To respond to this question, we analyzed proteomic datasets from biopsies of patients with genetic and acquired protein aggregate myopathy (PAM) by quantifying the changes in composition, concentration and aggregation propensity of proteins in the fibers containing inclusions and those surrounding them. We found that a metastable subproteome is present in skeletal muscle from healthy patients. The expression of this subproteome escalate as proteomic samples are taken more proximal to the pathologic inclusion, eventually exceeding its solubility limits and aggregating. While most supersaturated proteins decrease or maintain steady abundance across healthy fibers and inclusion-containing fibers, proteins within the metastable subproteome rise in abundance, suggesting that they escape regulation. Taken together, our results show in the context of a human conformational disorder that the supersaturation of a metastable subproteome underlies widespread aggregation and correlates with the histopathological state of the tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available