4.7 Article

Socioeconomic Inequities in Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Population-Level Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020442

Keywords

sleep apnea; adherence; positive airway pressure therapy; health disparities; big data; health policy; health equity

Funding

  1. Philips-Respironics, Inc [HRC-1504-RETROPAP-UAZ]
  2. National Institutes of Health Grants [HL126140, AG059202, OD028307, HL151254, HL138377]
  3. PCORI [DI-2018C2-13161, PPRND-1507-31666, PCS-1504-30430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

(a) Background: In patients with sleep apnea, poor adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy has been associated with mortality. Regional studies have suggested that lower socioeconomic status is associated with worse PAP adherence but population-level data is lacking. (b) Methods: De-identified data from a nationally representative database of PAP devices was geo-linked to sociodemographic information. (c) Results: In 170,641 patients, those in the lowest quartile of median household income had lower PAP adherence (4.1 + 2.6 hrs/night; 39.6% adherent by Medicare criteria) than those in neighborhoods with highest quartile median household income (4.5 + 2.5 hrs/night; 47% adherent by Medicare criteria; p < 0.0001). In multivariate regression, individuals in neighborhoods with the highest income quartile were more adherent to PAP therapy than those in the lowest income quartile after adjusting for various confounders (adjusted Odds Ratio (adjOR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14, 1.21; p < 0.0001). Over the past decade, PAP adherence improved over time (adjOR 1.96; 95%CI 1.94, 2.01), but health inequities in PAP adherence remained even after the Affordable Care Act was passed. (d) Conclusion: In a nationally representative population, disparities in PAP adherence persist despite Medicaid expansion. Interventions aimed at promoting health equity in sleep apnea need to be undertaken.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available