4.7 Article

Combined identification of three miRNAs in serum as effective diagnostic biomarkers for HNSCC

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.016

Keywords

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Microrna; Biomarker; Diagnosis; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Qilu Young Scholar Program of Shandong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a disastrous disease with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aims to explore the effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HNSCC. Methods: MiRNA expression data and corresponding clinical information of HNSCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed comprehensively to identify the miRNAs with diagnostic and prognostic power. The predictive ability of different classifications was analyzed for the three-miRNA combinations. Diagnostic and prognostic value were then evaluated and verified in clinical patients. Findings: 128 differentially expressed miRNAs in HNSCC tissues were identified in the TCGA dataset, and 10 miRNAs were finally selected for further study. Classification analysis developed a three-miRNA signature of hsa-mir-383, hsa-mir-615, and hsa-mir-877 with the best diagnosis power, which was verified in validation patients. Survival analysis indicated that different expression levels of hsa-mir-383, rather than that of hsamir-615 or hsa-mir-877 led to significantly different survival rates in both cohorts. Furthermore, the multivariate Cox hazards analysis suggested that the microRNA signature yielded statistical significance to predict clinical outcome independently from other clinical variables in validation patients. Interpretation: A three-miRNA signature of hsa-mir-383, hsa-mir-615, and hsa-mir-877 may serve as an excellent diagnostic biomarker for HNSCC, and potential prognostic significance for HNSCC patients. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available