4.6 Review

Development of InP Quantum Dot-Based Light-Emitting Diodes

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 1095-1106

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02824

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0401702, 2017YFE0120400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61674074, 61875082, 61405089]
  3. Guangdong Province's Key R&D Program: Micro-LED Display and Ultrahigh Brightness Microdisplay Technology [2019B010925001]
  4. Environmentally Friendly Quantum Dots Luminescent Materials [2019B010924001]
  5. Guangdong University Key Laboratory for Advanced Quantum Dot Displays and Lighting [2017KSYS007]
  6. Distinguished Young Scholar of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2017B030306010]
  7. Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Advanced Quantum Dot Displays and Lighting [ZDSYS201707281632549]
  8. Shenzhen Peacock Team Project [KQTD2016030111203005]
  9. Shenzhen Innovation Project [JSGG20170823160757004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-performance quantum dot light-emitting diodes (QLEDs) are being considered as a next-generation technology for energy efficient solid-state lighting and displays. InP QLEDs are the most promising alternative to the toxic CdSe QLEDs. Unlike the problems of poor hole injection in CdSe-based QLEDs, highly delocalized electrons and parasitic emissions are serious problems in green-emitting InP QLEDs. The loss mechanism and device physics in InP QLEDs have not been sufficiently studied since the first report of InP QLED in 2011. This Focus Review summarizes the recent efforts on improving the performance of InP QLEDs from the perspectives of core/shell structures to optimization of carrier transport layers. It is our intention to conduct a review as well as clarify some previous misunderstandings regarding the device physics in InP QLEDs and to provide some insights for the possible solutions to the challenging problems in InP QLEDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available