4.7 Article

Study on spatiotemporal distribution of airborne ozone pollution in subtropical region considering socioeconomic driving impacts: A case study in Guangzhou, China

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101989

Keywords

Ozone pollution; Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics; Multiple influencing factors; Economic analysis; Control strategies

Funding

  1. Yangchen Scholarship [201831837]
  2. Science Found of Guangdong [GD18JRZ01]
  3. National Social Science Fund of China [18BJL065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ozone has become the primary air pollutant in the subtropical regions (i.e., Guangzhou, China). This significantly hinders the sustainable development of cities. The purpose of this work was to find out the main influencing factors of ozone, then put forward feasible control strategies. We first analyzed the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of ozone in 2016-2018. The effects of environmental factors (e.g., CO) and meteorological factors (e.g., temperature) on ozone were investigated comprehensively. Furthermore, the relationship between economic growth and ozone in Guangzhou was analyzed. There were 48 days with excessive ozone in 2017. Ozone exceeding rate displayed an M curve. Moreover, the number of months with excessive ozone increased each year. About the influential factors, temperature was the primary factor affecting ozone with a significant positive correlation. CO, relative humidity, and NO2 were negatively correlated with ozone. Because of the contemporaneous rain and heat climate, precipitation exhibited a positive correlation with ozone. The quantitative-relationship curve between economic growth and ozone displayed U-shaped trend. The proposed plans for ozone control could contribute to the sustainable development of Guangzhou through source control, departmental coordination, and government policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available