4.6 Article

ITO/SiO2/ITO Structure on a Sapphire Substrate Using the Oxidation of Ultra-Thin Si Films as an Insulating Layer for One-Glass-Solution Capacitive Touch-Screen Panels

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings10020134

Keywords

Thin film: sputtering; ITO; SiO2; low-temperature oxidation; touch screen panel; sapphire; transmittance

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Education [2019R1A6A1A03032988]
  2. International Science and Business Belt Program through the Ministry of Science and ICT [2015-DD-RD-0068-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SiO2 generated by low-temperature oxidation of ultra-thin metallic silicon (thickness = 50 nm) film was evaluated for implementation in one-glass-solution capacitive touch-screen panels (OGS-TSPs) on sapphire-based substrates. Our results show that the silicon films oxidized at 823 K exhibited the highest visible transmittance about 91% at 550 nm, compared to similar to 72% transmittance of the as-deposited silicon films which were deposited at room temperature. Additionally, the annealed films exhibited a more uniform, dense, and smooth surface microstructure than that of the as-deposited Si films. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results revealed that the low-temperature oxidation of Si films at 823 K yielded SiO2. Furthermore, when the insulating SiO2 film obtained by low-temperature oxidation was sandwiched between two indium tin oxide (ITO) layers (ITO/SiO2/ITO) on a sapphire substrate, the SiO2 film resulted in the dielectric strength of approximately 3 MV/cm. In addition, the highest optical transmittance obtained by the ITO/SiO2/ITO films is about 88.3%. The change in capacitance of the ITO/SiO2/ITO structure was approximately 3.2 pF, which indicates the possibility of implementation in capacitive touch-screen panel devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available