4.6 Article

Nitrogen losses from two contrasting agricultural catchments in Norway

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190490

Keywords

nitrogen; nitrate losses; catchment; agriculture; Norway; climate change

Funding

  1. Central Committee's Special Project for Guiding Local Science and Technology Development [ZY18A04]
  2. Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Z17198]
  3. Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2018YYYF017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural areas, especially into drinking water and marine environments, attract substantial attention from governments and scientists. This study analysed nitrogen loss from runoff water using long-term monitoring data (1994-2016) from the Skuterud catchment in southeastern Norway and the Naurstad catchment in northern Norway. Precipitation and runoff were lower in the Skuterud catchment than in the Naurstad catchment. However, in the Skuterud catchment, the annual total N (TN) losses ranged from 27 to 68 kg hm(-2). High precipitation (1247 mm) in the Naurstad catchment resulted in substantial runoff water (1108 mm) but relatively low total TN losses ranged from 17 to 35 kg hm(-2). The proportion of nitrate losses to TN loss was 51-86% and 28-50% in the Skuterud and Naurstad catchments, respectively. Furthermore, the monthly average TN concentrations and nitrate losses had two peaks, in April-May and October, in the Skuterud catchment; however, no significant fluctuations were found in the Naurstad catchment. The contributions of N and runoff water to TN and nitrate losses were calculated using multiple linear regression, and runoff water was the major contributor to TN loss in both catchments. Runoff water was the main factor in the Skuterud catchment, and the nitrate-N concentration was the main factor in the Naurstad catchment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available