4.7 Article

Earthquake Initiation From Laboratory Observations and Implications for Foreshocks

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 124, Issue 12, Pages 12882-12904

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JB018363

Keywords

earthquake nucleation; instability; bifurcation; friction; rupture propagation; heterogeneity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR1645163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews laboratory observations of earthquake initiation and describes new experiments on a 3-m rock sample where the nucleation process is imaged in detail. Many of the laboratory observations are consistent with previous work that showed a slow and smoothly accelerating earthquake nucleation process that expands to a critical nucleation length scale L-c, before it rapidly accelerates to dynamic fault rupture. The experiments also highlight complexities not currently considered by most theoretical and numerical models. This includes a loading rate dependency where a kick above steady state produces smaller and more abrupt initiation. Heterogeneity of fault strength also causes abrupt initiation when creep fronts coalesce on a stuck patch that is somewhat stronger than the surrounding fault. Taken together, these two mechanisms suggest a rate-dependent cascade up model for earthquake initiation. This model simultaneously accounts for foreshocks that are a by-product of a larger nucleation process and similarities between initial P wave signatures of small and large earthquakes. A diversity of nucleation conditions are expected in the Earth's crust, ranging from slip limited environments with L-c < 1 m, to ignition-limited environments with L-c > 10 km. In the latter case, L-c fails to fully characterize the initiation process since earthquakes nucleate not because a slipping patch reaches a critical length but because fault slip rate exceeds a critical power density needed to ignite dynamic rupture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available