4.6 Article

Application of Biochar Derived From Pyrolysis of Waste Fiberboard on Tetracycline Adsorption in Aqueous Solution

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00943

Keywords

biochar; tetracycline; fiberboard; adsorption; pyrolysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876093]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFE0183600]
  3. Start-up Fund for Scientific Research of Nanjing Forestry University [GXL2018033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, biochars derived from waste fiberboard biomass were applied in tetracycline (TC) removal in aqueous solution. Biochar samples were prepared by slow pyrolysis at 300, 500, and 800 degrees C, and were characterized by ultimate analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), etc. The effects of ionic strength (0-1.0 mol/L of NaCl), initial TC concentration (2.5-60 ppm), biochar dosage (1.5-2.5 g/L), and initial pH (2-10) were systemically determined. The results present that biochar prepared at 800 degrees C (BC800) generally possesses the highest aromatization degree and surface area with abundant pyridinic N (N-6) and accordingly shows a better removal efficiency (68.6%) than the other two biochar samples. Adsorption isotherm data were better fitted by the Freundlich model (R-2 is 0.94) than the Langmuir model (R-2 is 0.85). Thermodynamic study showed that the adsorption process is endothermic and mainly physical in nature with the values of Delta H-0 being 48.0 kJ/mol, Delta S-0 being 157.1 J/mol/K, and Delta G(0) varying from 1.02 to -2.14 kJ/mol. The graphite-like structure in biochar enables the pi-pi interactions with a ring structure in the TC molecule, which, together with the N-6 acting as electron donor, is the main driving force of the adsorption process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available