4.7 Article

Systematic design of high-strength multicomponent metamaterials

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108124

Keywords

Metamaterial; Materials by design; Additive manufacturing; Sensitivity analysis; Multimaterial lattice structures

Funding

  1. Louisiana Tech University
  2. DoE-ARPA-E OPEN
  3. NASA-EPSCoR
  4. NSF(2018)-CIMMSeed-18 [Louisiana EPSCoR-OIA-1541079]
  5. NSF(2018)-CIMMSeed-19 [Louisiana EPSCoR-OIA-1541079]
  6. LEQSF(2015-18)-LaSPACE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emergence of additive manufacturing, along with the introduction of the concept of metamaterials, allows the synthesis of high-performance materials with superior specific strength. With recent advances in printing multi-material structures, the design space of metamaterials has exponentially grown. Variation in dimensions of the printed metamaterials due to limitations of the manufacturing process can drastically offset their performance compared to their original design. So far, the impact of deviations in the manufactured metamaterials and their effect on their final performance has not been studied systematically. There are also no guidelines for selecting materials in a multi-material lattice structure to achieve higher mechanical performance. Here, the strength and toughness of printed single- and bimaterial lattice structures with a combinatorial selection of materials and their sensitivity to the printing parameters are studied. We show that the exterior elements dominate the overall mechanical performance of the metamaterial compared to the internal elements. We found two regimes of slow and fast softening in periodic lattices. We study the sensitivity of the mechanical performance of the printed metamaterial to variations in the thickness of internal and exterior elements in detail. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available