4.7 Article

Matrix adaptation evolution strategies for optimization under nonlinear equality constraints

Journal

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100653

Keywords

Matrix adaptation evolution strategies; Nonlinear constraints; Nonlinear manifold; Experimental evaluation

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P29651-N32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work concerns the design of matrix adaptation evolution strategies for black-box optimization under nonlinear equality constraints. First, constraints in form of elliptical manifolds are considered. For those constraints, an algorithm is proposed that evolves itself on that manifold while optimizing the objective function. The specialty about the approach is that it is possible to ensure that the population evolves on the manifold with closed-form expressions. Second, an algorithm design for general nonlinear equality constraints is presented. For those constraints considered, an iterative repair approach is presented. This allows the evolution to happen on the nonlinear manifold defined by the equality constraints for this more general case as well. For both cases, the algorithms are interior point methods, i.e., the objective function is only evaluated at feasible points in the parameter space, which is often required in the area of simulation-based optimization. For the experimental evaluation, different test problems are introduced. The proposed algorithms are evaluated on those providing insights into the working principles of the different approaches. It is experimentally shown that correcting the mutation vectors after the repair step is important for an effective evolution strategy. Additional experiments are conducted for providing a comparison to other evolutionary black-box optimization methods, which show that the developed algorithms are competitive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available