4.7 Article

Constitutive equation and model validation for 33Cr23Ni8Mn3N heat-resistant steel during hot compression

Journal

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102633

Keywords

33Cr23Ni8Mn3N; Johnson-Cookmodel; Thermal deformation; Constitutive equation; Fields-Backofen model

Funding

  1. Hebei Provincial Department of Education Youth Talents Project [BJ2019010]
  2. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Found [2018M641186]
  3. graduate student innovation fund of North China University of Science and Technology [2019S28]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to more accurately predict the plastic flow behavior of 33Cr23Ni8Mn3N heat-resistant steel, it provides a good foundation for numerical simulation. The selection of constitutive models is crucial. The Gleeble-1500D thermal simulation tester was used to perform thermal compression experiments on 33Cr23Ni8Mn3N heat-resistant steel under different deformation conditions. Based on the experimental data, the Johnson-Cook (JC), Fields-Backofen (FB) constitutive models and their modified constitutive models are established and compared. The characteristics of JC model, FB model, modified JC (m-JC) model, modified FB (m-FB) model and strain-compensated Arrhenius (strain-compensated Arr) model are demonstrated. It is determined that the strain-compensated Arr model has the best accuracy for predicting the thermal deformation behavior of 33Cr23Ni8Mn3N heat-resistant steel. In addition, finite element development was carried out and programming was performed using Absoft Pro Fortran 8.0 software. Various modified models are embedded in Deform-3D for numerical simulation comparison. The results of numerical simulation show that the strain-compensated Arr model is more suitable for finite element simulation of 33Cr23Ni8Mn3N heat-resistant steel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available