4.1 Article

Severe proteinuria as a parameter of worse perinatal/neonatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2019.12.013

Keywords

Preeclampsia; Proteinuria; Pulmonary edema; Central serous chorioretinopathy; Preterm birth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the severity of proteinuria and maternal/neonatal outcomes among women with preeclampsia. Study design: Proteinuria severity was measured at preeclampsia diagnosis and at delivery in 94 women with preeclampsia (among 2904 women with singleton pregnancies, who delivered after 22 gestational weeks). Preeclampsia was defined as hypertension with proteinuria. Main outcome measures: Protein:creatinine (P/C) ratio to worse the maternal outcome was 4.8 among women with preeclampsia. Results: The frequencies of HELLP syndrome and maternal pulmonary edema in women with a P/C ratio >= 5.0 (35.5% and 35.5%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in women with a P/C ratio < 5.0 (12.7%, P = 0.014 and 6.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). The best P/C ratio cutoff value to determine early-onset preeclampsia and early preterm birth (EPB) was 4.1 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The best P/C ratio cutoff values to determine the interval between the preeclampsia diagnosis and delivery < 7 days and the need to undergo cesarean section were 1.8 and 1.5, respectively. The best P/C ratio cutoff value to determine maternal pulmonary edema and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) was 4.8 (P = 0.020 and P = 0.014, respectively). Finally, the best P/C ratio cutoff values to determine EPB and maternal CSC in women with preeclampsia were 4.1 (odds ratio, 10.9; 95% confidence interval; 4.08 to 29.2, P < 0.0001) and 4.8 (odds ratio, 17.6; 95% confidence interval; 0.898 to 344, P = 0.0008), respectively, according to the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: A higher P/C ratio at delivery in women with preeclampsia might cause EPB and CSC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available