4.5 Article

Rational design of the micron-sized particle size of LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 cathode material with enhanced electrochemical performance for Li-ion batteries

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab67f3

Keywords

lithium ion batteries; micron-sized; particle size; electrochemical performance; tap density

Funding

  1. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1908085QE180]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for High-Level Talents of West Anhui University [WGKQ201702004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, micron-sized LiMn1-xFexPO4 cathode materials have attracted attention due to its better rate capability and higher tap density than the nano-sized ones. However, the influence of the particle size on the energy density of micron-sized LiMn1-xFexPO4 is still unknown. In this paper, we report the optimal particle size of the micron-sized LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 with enhanced electrochemical performance as cathode material in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 sample with the particle size of similar to 9.39 mu m delivers the initial discharge capacity of 124 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C rate with high capacity retention of 94.35% after 100 cycles, which is higher than that with the particle sizes of similar to 2.71 mu m, similar to 3.74 mu m, similar to 6.41 mu m or similar to 16.31 mu m. This structure with the specific capacity of 122 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 C rate and 106 mAh g(-1) at 3 C rate also exhibits excellent rate performances. The improved electrochemical performances are mainly derived from its fast Li+ diffusion, which causes the higher ionic conductivity. The LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 sample with the particle sizes of similar to 9.39 mu m also shows the highest tap density (0.68 g cc(-1)) among the as-prepared samples. This finding provides a new way to enhance the energy density of other cathode materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available