4.6 Article

A Deep Parallel Diagnostic Method for Transformer Dissolved Gas Analysis

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10041329

Keywords

adaptive synthetic oversampling; convolutional neural networks; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; dissolved gas analysis; deep parallel diagnosis; long short-term memory; transformer; fault diagnosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977153, 51977161, 51577046]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51637004]
  3. National Key Research and Development Plan of China Important Scientific Instruments and Equipment Development [2016YFF0102200]
  4. Equipment Research Project in Advance of China [41402040301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the development of Industry 4.0, as a pivotal part of the power system, large-capacity power transformers are requiring fault diagnostic methods with higher intelligence, accuracy and anti-interference ability. Considering the powerful capability for extracting non-linear features and the sensitivity differences to features of deep learning methods, this paper proposes a deep parallel diagnostic method for transformer dissolved gas analysis (DGA). In view of the insufficient and imbalanced dataset of transformers, adaptive synthetic oversampling (ADASYN) was implemented to augment the fault dataset. Then, the newly constructed dataset was normalized and input into the LSTM-based diagnostic framework. Then, the dataset was converted into images as the input of the CNN-based diagnostic framework. At the same time, the problem of still insufficient data was compensated by the introduction of transfer learning technology. Finally, the diagnostic models were trained and tested respectively, and the Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory was introduced to fuse the diagnostic confidence matrices of the two models to achieve deep parallel diagnosis. The results of the proposed deep parallel diagnostic method show that without complex feature extraction, the diagnostic accuracy rate could reach 96.9%. Even when the dataset was superimposed with 3% random noises, the rate only decreased by 0.62%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available