4.6 Article

GIS-Based Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Models Using Certainty Factors and Functional Trees-Based Ensemble Techniques

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10010016

Keywords

landslide susceptibility mapping; ensemble techniques; functional trees; bagging; rotation forest; dagging

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41807192]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2019JLM-7, 2019JQ-094]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018AT111084, 2017M61318]
  4. Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017BSHYDZZ07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main purpose of this paper is to use ensembles techniques of functional tree-based bagging, rotation forest, and dagging (functional trees (FT), bagging-functional trees (BFT), rotation forest-functional trees (RFFT), dagging-functional trees (DFT)) for landslide susceptibility modeling in Zichang County, China. Firstly, 263 landslides were identified, and the landslide inventory map was established, and the landslide locations were randomly divided into 70% (training data) and 30% (validation data). Then, 14 landslide conditioning factors were selected. Furthermore, the correlation analysis between conditioning factors and landslides was applied using the certainty factor method. Hereafter, four models were applied for landslide susceptibility modeling and zoning. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and statistical parameters were used to evaluate and compare the overall performance of the four models. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the four models was larger than 0.74. Among them, the BFT model is better than the other three models. In addition, this study also illustrated that the integrated model is not necessarily more effective than a single model. The ensemble data mining technology used in this study can be used as an effective tool for future land planning and monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available