4.8 Review

Nanocarbon Catalysts: Recent Understanding Regarding the Active Sites

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902126

Keywords

edge sites and topological defects; heteroatom doping; M-N-x-C; nanocarbon catalysts; surface functionalization

Funding

  1. Thousand Young Talents Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602200, 61874074, 21905073]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653006]
  5. Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170817101100705]
  6. Key Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2016KZDXM008]
  7. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053112042971]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although carbon itself acts as a catalyst in various reactions, the classical carbon materials (e.g., activated carbons, carbon aerogels, carbon black, carbon fiber, etc.) usually show low activity, stability, and oxidation resistance. With the recent availability of nanocarbon catalysts, the application of carbon materials in catalysis has gained a renewed momentum. The research is concentrated on tailoring the surface chemistry of nanocarbon materials, since the pristine carbons in general are not active for heterogeneous catalysis. Surface functionalization, doping with heteroatoms, and creating defects are the most used strategies to make efficient catalysts. However, the nature of the catalytic active sites and their role in determining the activity and selectivity is still not well understood. Herein, the types of active sites reported for several mainstream nanocarbons, including carbon nanotubes, graphene-based materials, and 3D porous nanocarbons, are summarized. Knowledge about the active sites will be beneficial for the design and synthesis of nanocarbon catalysts with improved activity, selectivity, and stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available