3.8 Article

Encapsulation and Storage of Therapeutic Fibrin-Homing Peptides using Conducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Programmed Release by Electrical Stimulation

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 2135-2145

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01794

Keywords

controlled release; CREKA; drug delivery; electrical stimuli; PEDOT; tumor-homing peptide

Funding

  1. MINECO/FEDER [RTI2018-098951-B-I00]
  2. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca [2017SGR359]
  3. B. Braun Surgical S.A. company
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cys-Arg-Glu-Lys-Ala (CREKA) is an important fibrinhoming pentapeptide that has been extensively demonstrated for diagnoses and therapies (e.g., image diagnosis of tumors and to inhibit tumor cell migration and invasion). Although CREKA-loaded nanoparticles (NPs) have received major interest as efficient biomedical systems for cancer diagnosis and treatment, almost no control on the peptide release has been achieved yet. Herein, we report the development of conductive polymer NPs as therapeutic CREKA carriers for controlled dose administration through electric stimuli. Furthermore, the study was extended to CR(NMe)EKA, a previously engineered CREKA analogue in which Glu was replaced by N-methyl-Glu for improvement of the peptide resistance against proteolysis, which is one of the major weaknesses of therapeutic peptide delivery, and for enhancement of the tumor homing capacity by overstabilizing the bioactive conformation. Particularly, the present work is focused on understanding the interactions between the newly designed nanoengineered materials and biological fluids and the achievement of a modulated peptide release by fine-tuning the electrical stimuli. Two different types of stimuli were compared, chronoamperometry versus cyclic voltammetry, the latter being more effective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available