4.1 Article

Spatiotemporal variations of water resources metabolism efficiency in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 1178-1188

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.028

Keywords

Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region; material flow analysis; spatiotemporal variations; virtual water; water resources metabolism efficiency

Funding

  1. National Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07101001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601600]
  3. Project of the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Higher Education of China [JC1503]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWU019047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive and extensive water consumption and its potential negative impacts are increasingly challenging regional development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region (BTH). It is necessary to enhance the metabolic efficiency of both physical and virtual water, and the latter is often neglected in research and practical fields. The material flow analysis method was employed in evaluating spatiotemporal variations of the Water Resources Metabolism Efficiency (WME) for exploring the inherent driving mechanisms in the BTH region. Results indicate that the WME increased obviously and differently in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, as well as in the whole BTH region from 1990 to 2015. The changes in WME depend significantly on the improvement in society and economics. Water production and water consumption are crucial for the integrated metabolic efficiency of physical and virtual water, followed by other influencing factors, i.e., freshwater recycling use ratio (R-fw), total retail amount of commodities of unit water use (C-w), and industrial output value per cubic metre of water resources (U-io). The results could provide alternative references for efficient and effective utilization of water resources within and beyond similar cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available