4.7 Article

Comprehensive Characterization of Somatic Mutations Impacting lncRNA Expression for Pan-Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 66-79

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.08.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31601080, 61603116]
  2. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province [UNPYSCT-2017071, UNPYSCT-2017060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Somatic mutations have long been recognized as an important feature of cancer. However, analysis of somatic mutations, to date, has focused almost entirely on the protein coding regions of the genome. The potential roles of somatic mutations in human long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are therefore largely unknown, particularly their functional significance across different cancer types. In this study, we characterized some lncRNAs whose expression was affected by somatic mutations (defined as MutLncs) and constructed global MutLnc landscapes across 17 cancer types by systematically integrating multiple levels of data. MutLncs were commonly downregulated and carried low mutation frequencies and non-silent mutations in most cancer types. Co-occurrence analysis in pan-cancer highlighted combined patterns of specific MutLncs, suggesting that a number of MutLncs influence diverse cancer types through combination effects. Several conserved and cancer-specific functions of MutLncs were determined. We further explored the somatic mutations affecting lncRNA expression via mixed and unmixed effects, which led to specific functions in pan-cancer. Survival analysis indicated that MutLncs and co-occurrence pairs can potentially serve as cancer biomarkers. Clarification of the specific roles of MutLncs in human cancers could be beneficial for understanding the molecular pathogenesis of different cancer types and developing the appropriate treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available