4.3 Article

New insights on single-stranded versus double-stranded DNA library preparation for ancient DNA

Journal

BIOTECHNIQUES
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 368-371

Publisher

BIOTECHNIQUES OFFICE
DOI: 10.2144/000114364

Keywords

ancient DNA; paleogenomics; DNA library preparation; next-generation sequencing

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [R52-A5062]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research [10-081390]
  3. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF94]
  4. Marie Curie Actions FP7 People [290344]
  5. Marie Curie Actions Intra-European Fellowship [FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF-298820]
  6. [FP7-IEF-328024]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1640788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [1640788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An innovative single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library preparation method has sparked great interest among ancient DNA (aDNA) researchers, especially after reports of endogenous DNA content increases >20-fold in some samples. To investigate the behavior of this method, we generated ssDNA and conventional double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) libraries from 23 ancient and historic plant and animal specimens. We found ssDNA library preparation substantially increased endogenous content when dsDNA libraries contained <3% endogenous DNA, but this enrichment is less pronounced when dsDNA preparations successfully recover short endogenous DNA fragments (mean size < 70 bp). Our findings can help researchers determine when to utilize the time-and resource-intensive ssDNA library preparation method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available