4.6 Review

Quantum Dots and Gold Nanoparticles as Scaffolds for Enzymatic Enhancement: Recent Advances and the Influence of Nanoparticle Size

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal10010083

Keywords

enzyme; nanoparticle; biocatalysis; quantum dots; substrate channeling; scaffold

Funding

  1. NRL Base 6.1 funds
  2. NRL Nanoscience Institute
  3. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [11901762]
  4. U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (ASD(R&E)) through the Applied Research for Advancement of S&T Priorities Synthetic Biology for Military Environments program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticle scaffolds can impart multiple benefits onto immobilized enzymes including enhanced stability, activity, and recoverability. The magnitude of these benefits is modulated by features inherent to the scaffold-enzyme conjugate, amongst which the size of the nanoscaffold itself can be critically important. In this review, we highlight the benefits of enzyme immobilization on nanoparticles and the factors affecting these benefits using quantum dots and gold nanoparticles as representative materials due to their maturity. We then review recent literature on the use of these scaffolds for enzyme immobilization and as a means to dissect the underlying mechanisms. Detailed analysis of the literature suggests that there is a sweet-spot for scaffold size and the ratio of immobilized enzyme to scaffold, with smaller scaffolds and lower enzyme:scaffold ratios generally providing higher enzymatic activities. We anticipate that ongoing studies of enzyme immobilization onto nanoscale scaffolds will continue to sharpen our understanding of what gives rise to beneficial characteristics and allow for the next important step, namely, that of translation to large-scale processes that exploit these properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available