4.4 Review

Review of organic mulching effects on soil and water loss

Journal

ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 136-151

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1718111

Keywords

Organic mulches; straw mulches; wood-based mulches; living mulches; soil and water conservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic mulch is proven effective for soil and water conservation worldwide, with a recommended application rate of 6-10 Mg ha(-1) significantly reducing soil and water loss. Different mulch materials and experimental site types have minor impacts on reducing soil loss and runoff, while measurement methods play a significant role in the process.
Organic mulch is an important agronomic measure which has proven effective for soil and water conservation worldwide. However, the appropriate mulch application rate, mulch material for soil erosion and runoff reduction need to be further discussed on a global scale. The results of this study confirmed that, under various environmental conditions, organic mulch had positive effects on soil and water conservation. Mulch application rate greatly impacted soil and water loss; generally, with the increase of mulch application rate, the rates of soil loss and runoff reduction increased and when mulch application rate reached 6-10 Mg ha(-1), soil and water loss decreased significantly. There were no significant differences among the three types of mulch materials tested in terms of rate of reducing soil loss and runoff. Similarly, experimental site types had a weak impact on soil and water loss. Research scale did not have a significant impact on the rate of reducing soil loss but significantly affected runoff. Measurement method obviously impacted the rate of reducing soil loss and runoff. These results suggest that the mulch application rate of 6-8 Mg ha(-1) has a regulating effect on soil and water loss under most global environmental conditions, and straw is strongly recommended for mulching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available