4.2 Article

A data management workflow of biodiversity data from the field to data users

Journal

APPLICATIONS IN PLANT SCIENCES
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11310

Keywords

biodiversity data; FAIR data principles; natural history collections; plant-diversity; research infrastructure

Categories

Funding

  1. Botanical Society of America
  2. Central Michigan University
  3. Hanes Trust Foundation
  4. Michigan Garden Club Inc.
  5. NatureServe
  6. The Nature Conservancy
  7. U.S. National Science Foundation [DBI-1730526]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PREMISE: Heterogeneity of biodiversity data from the collections, research, and management communities presents challenges for data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. Workflows designed with data collection, standards, dissemination, and reuse in mind will generate better information across geopolitical, administrative, and institutional boundaries. Here, we present our data workflow as a case study of how we collected, shared, and used data from multiple sources. METHODS: In 2012, we initiated the collection of biodiversity data relating to Michigan prairie fens, including data on plant communities and the federally endangered Poweshiek skipperling (Oarisma poweshiek). RESULTS: Over 23,000 occurrence records were compiled in a database following Darwin Core standards. The records were linked with media and biological, chemical, and geometric measurements. We published the data as Global Biodiversity Information Facility data sets and in Symbiota SEINet portals. DISCUSSION: We highlight data collection techniques that optimized transcription time, including the use of predetermined and controlled vocabulary, Darwin Core terms, and data dictionaries. The validity and longevity of our data were supported by voucher specimens, metadata with measurement records, and published manuscripts detailing methods and data sets. Key to our data dissemination was cooperation among partners and the utilization of dynamic tools. To increase data interoperability, we need flexible and customizable data collection templates, coding, and enhanced communication among communities using biodiversity data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available