4.6 Article

Temporal and Spatial Differences in the Resilience of Smart Cities and Their Influencing Factors: Evidence from Non-Provincial Cities in China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12041321

Keywords

resilience index; influencing factors; smart city; non-provincial city; GWR

Funding

  1. National Social Science Project [18VSJ036]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC71804056, NSFC71672111, NSFC71932004, NSFC71573166, NSFC71173045, NSFC71834005, NSFC71673232]
  3. NSFC-ESRC Joint Funding [NSFC71661137004]
  4. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of the Ministry of Education of China [18YJC630250]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642033]
  6. Hubei Provincial Technical Innovation Project (soft science research) [2018ADC052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the sample data of 81 non-provincial smart cities in China in 2017, the comprehensive evaluation index of the resilience of sample cities is calculated by using the entropy method, and the spatial differences of different factors on the resiliency are analyzed by using the geographical weighted regression (GWR) model. The conclusions are as follows: Firstly, the comprehensive evaluation index of the resilience of smart cities presents a spatial distribution characteristic of decreasing from the east to the west. At the same time, the resilience comprehensive index, the public infrastructure resilience capacity index, the economic development resilience index, the social security resilience index, and the ecological environment resilience index of smart cities have obvious agglomeration effects on their geographical spaces. Secondly, the public infrastructure resilience capacity index and the ecological environment resilience index are both low with a discrete distribution, while the economic development resilience index and the social security resilience index are both high with a concentrated distribution. Thirdly, different factors have significantly positive effects on the resilience of smart cities. In particular, the public infrastructure capacity resilience index decreases from the north to the south with the spatial distribution pattern of concentration, the economic development resilience index and the ecological environment resilience index of smart cities decrease from the east to the west with a concentrated spatial distribution pattern, and the social security resilience index of smart cities decreases from the southwest to the northeast with a concentrated spatial distribution pattern. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance awareness of smart cities, strengthen the driving force of science and technology innovation, strengthen public infrastructure and service construction, and continuously improve the rapid resilience of smart cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available