4.5 Article

Evaluation of molecular identification of Aspergillus species causing fungal keratitis

Journal

SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 751-756

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.030

Keywords

Keratitis; Aspergillus; ITS; DNA sequencing; Calmodulin

Categories

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia [R-1441-51]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fungal keratitis caused by the species of Aspergillus is a common and leading problem in developing countries like India. In this study, a total of 135 isolates from Aspergillus keratitis were studied by sequence analyses of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region performed by nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST analysis followed by the initial identification of the isolates based on conidial and colony morphology. The sequence analysis revealed several unusual species which were never reported in eye infections such as A. tamrii, A. tubingensis, A. braslliensis, A. nomius, A. pseudonomius, A. sydowii, Eurotium amstelodami. The sequence analysis of the ITS region; the beta-tubulin and calmodulin genes brought out the genetic diversity among the isolates as the study intended to locate a more sensitive target sequence to study genetic diversity among a set of test fungal isolates. The PCR amplified sequences of the test isolates of the study as well as sequences belonging to section Flavi obtained from Genbank database were compared and analyzed along with three standard isolates by phylogenetic tree (Neighbor-joining) as to find out a target region/gene that could produce a better resolution to differentiate the isolates. Accordingly, the calmodulin gene had provided better resolution compared to ITS and beta-tubulin to study the diversity among the test Aspergillus species isolated from fungal corneal ulcer. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available