4.8 Article

Highly efficient copper-rich chalcopyrite solar cells from DMF molecular solution

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104438

Keywords

CIGS; Chalcopyrite; Cu-rich; High pressure; Selenization; DMF

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21571106]
  2. Synergetic Innovation Centre for Organic Electronics and Information Displays
  3. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province
  4. National Science Foundation [NNCI-1542101]
  5. University of Washington
  6. Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute
  7. Clean Energy Institute
  8. National Institutes of Health
  9. Australian Renewable Energy Agency [RND011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Theoretical calculation suggests Cu-rich chalcopyrite absorbers contain less defects and have potential to achieve better performance than Cu-poor absorbers. However, this has not been demonstrated due to the detrimental Cu2-xSe impurity remaining in the absorber. Here, we report highly efficient Cu-rich chalcopyrite solar cells by selenizing dimethylformamide molecular precursor solution processed precursor films under high Ar pressure. Characterizations using XRD, Raman, SEM, TEM, c-AFM, PL, and glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES) show high pressure selenization enables high quality Cu-rich chalcopyrite absorber materials with stoichiometric composition, smooth surface, high conductivity, and Cu2-xSe free grain boundaries, leading to efficient CuIn(S,Se)(2) and Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)(2) devices with power conversion efficiency of 14.5% and 15.2%, both are the best performing chalcopyrite solar cells from non-hydrazine solutions. Our results demonstrate high Ar pressure selenization is a new strategy to fabricate high quality Cu-rich absorber which has great potential to further improve chalcopyrite solar cell efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available