4.5 Review

Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making

Journal

JAMA SURGERY
Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages 148-158

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [R01 GM113945-01]
  2. NIGMS [R01 GM110240, P50 GM-111152, R01GM114290, T32 GM-008721]
  3. CAREER award from the National Science Foundation, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems [NSF-IIS 1750192]
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R21EB027344-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Importance Surgeons make complex, high-stakes decisions under time constraints and uncertainty, with significant effect on patient outcomes. This review describes the weaknesses of traditional clinical decision-support systems and proposes that artificial intelligence should be used to augment surgical decision-making. Observations Surgical decision-making is dominated by hypothetical-deductive reasoning, individual judgment, and heuristics. These factors can lead to bias, error, and preventable harm. Traditional predictive analytics and clinical decision-support systems are intended to augment surgical decision-making, but their clinical utility is compromised by time-consuming manual data management and suboptimal accuracy. These challenges can be overcome by automated artificial intelligence models fed by livestreaming electronic health record data with mobile device outputs. This approach would require data standardization, advances in model interpretability, careful implementation and monitoring, attention to ethical challenges involving algorithm bias and accountability for errors, and preservation of bedside assessment and human intuition in the decision-making process. Conclusions and Relevance Integration of artificial intelligence with surgical decision-making has the potential to transform care by augmenting the decision to operate, informed consent process, identification and mitigation of modifiable risk factors, decisions regarding postoperative management, and shared decisions regarding resource use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available