4.4 Article

Higgs Quark Flavor Violation: Simplified Models and Status of General Two-Higgs-Doublet Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2020)147

Keywords

Phenomenological Models

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council through the Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale [CE110001004]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [UID/FIS/00777/2019, CERN/FIS-PAR/0004/2017, PTDC/FIS-PAR/29436/2017]
  3. H2020-MSCA-RISE project InvisiblesPlus
  4. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT140100244]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study quark flavor violating interactions mediated by the Higgs boson h. We consider observables involving a third generation quark, of both the up and the down quark sectors, like h -> bs and t -> ch. Using an effective field theory approach we systematically list all the possible tree-level ultraviolet completions, which comprise models with vector-like quarks and/or extra scalars. We provide upper bounds on the flavor violating transitions allowed by current limits stemming from low energy processes, such as meson mixing and b -> s gamma. We find that scenarios with vector-like quarks always have very suppressed flavor-violating transitions, while a general Two-Higgs-Doublet Model may have a sizeable rate. To study the latter case in detail, we perform a full numerical simulation taking into account all relevant theoretical and phenomenological constraints. Our results show that BR(t -> ch) [BR(h -> bs)] are still allowed at the sub-percent [percent] level, which are being [may be] explored at the LHC [future colliders]. Finally, we have found that the mild mass-splitting discrepancy with respect to the SM in the B-s meson system can be accommodated in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model. If confirmed, it yields the prediction BR(h -> bs) similar or equal to 10(-4), if the new contribution to the mass-splitting is dominated by tree-level Higgs boson exchange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available