4.7 Article

Grid-Synchronization Stability Analysis and Loop Shaping for PLL-Based Power Converters With Different Reactive Power Control

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 501-516

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2924295

Keywords

Grid-synchronization instability; loop shaping phase-locked loop (PLL); reactive power control (RPC); small signal stability; voltage feedforward (VFF); weak grids

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Project of State Grid Power Company Limited [521104190005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Power converters may lose synchronization with the remaining network when integrated in a weak power grid. Such an instability phenomenon [known as grid-synchronization instability (GSI)] features the frequency divergence of phase-locked loop (PLL) and oscillations of the converter's power output. In this paper, we focus on the influences of reactive power control (RPC) methods on GSI. We develop a single-input-single-output model to explicitly reveal how the PLL interacts with the other parts of the converter system in terms of grid synchronization. Then, after deriving the open-loop transfer function and sensitivity function of the entire converter system, we compare the stability margins for different RPC methods. Furthermore, we elaborate on the interactions among RPC, PLL, and voltage feedforward (VFF), and then demonstrate that different design methods of RPC and VFF will lead to different stability margins. The subsequent stability analysis provides insightful guidelines for coordinating the design of multiple control loops, i.e., RPC, VFF, and PLL. In particular, we demonstrate how the loop shaping of PLL takes effect in increasing the stability margin and eventually preventing the converter from GSI. The validity of the stability analysis is verified through simulations in MATLAB/Simulink.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available