4.7 Article

Energy Peer-to-Peer Trading in Virtual Microgrids in Smart Grids: A Game-Theoretic Approach

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 1264-1275

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2934830

Keywords

CO2 emission; communication; energy trading; non-cooperative game; non-renewable energy; peer-to-peer; Stackelberg game; virtual microgrid

Funding

  1. Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading and Sharing -3M (MultiTimes, Multi-Scales, Multi-Qualities) Project - Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N03466X/1]
  2. Triangulum Project (H2020 Smart Cities and Communities Programme) - European Commission [646578-Triangulum-H2020-2014-2015/H2020-SCC-2014]
  3. EPSRC [EP/N03466X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, energy consumers pay non-commodity charges (e.g., transmission, environmental and network costs) as a major component of their energy bills. With the distributed energy generation, enabling energy consumption close to producers can minimize such costs. The physically constrained energy prosumers in power networks can be logically grouped into virtual microgrids (VMGs) using telecommunication systems. Prosumer benefits can be optimised by modelling the energy trading interactions among producers and consumers in a VMG as a Stackelberg game in which producers lead and consumers follow. Considering renewable (RES) and non-renewable energy (nRES) resources, and given that RES are unpredictable thus unschedulable, we also describe cost and utility models that include load uncertainty demands of producers. The results show that under Stackelberg equilibrium (SE), the costs incurred by a consumer for procuring either the RES or nRES are significantly reduced while the derived utility by producer is maximized. We further show that when the number of prosumers in the VMG increases, the CO2 emission cost and consequently the energy cost are minimized at the SE. Lastly, we evaluate the peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading scenario involving noncooperative energy prosumers with and without Stackelberg game. The results show that the P2P energy prosumers attain 47% higher benefits with Stackelberg game.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available