4.7 Article

Transient High-Frequency Impedance Comparison-Based Protection for Flexible DC Distribution Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 323-333

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2019.2921387

Keywords

Circuit faults; Impedance; Transient analysis; Fault diagnosis; DC distribution systems; Fault currents; High frequency; Flexible DC grid; modular multilevel converter; high-frequency impedance; directional pilot protection

Funding

  1. State's Key Project of Research and Development Plan [2018YFB0904100]
  2. NSFC [51725702, 51777071]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program, CAST [2018QNRC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible direct current (dc) distribution systems have emerged as the development trend for future distribution grids. However, these systems are vulnerable to dc faults, rapid fault identification and faulted line selection method are required to enhance the security of the entire system. A novel transient high-frequency impedance comparison-based dc protection for flexible dc distribution systems is proposed in this paper. The control-independent high-frequency impedance model of power converter is also investigated. Based on this model, the proposed method identified the faulted lines by comparing high-frequency impedance measurement differences. For dc bus with multiple branches, this technique minimizes the threshold calculation job, which is usually difficult to process for the transient value-based protections. Strict synchronization of data is also not required for this method. The simulation model of four-terminal flexible dc distribution networks is built in PSCAD/EMTDC to verify the effectiveness of the proposed protection model. Simulation results prove that the protection is robust to fault transition resistances and the measurement noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available