4.6 Article

Interval MULTIMOORA Method Integrating Interval Borda Rule and Interval Best-Worst-Method-Based Weighting Model: Case Study on Hybrid Vehicle Engine Selection

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 1157-1169

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2889730

Keywords

Decision making; Entropy; Gold; Engines; Mathematical model; Computational modeling; Cybernetics; Group interval best-worst method (BWM); hybrid vehicle engine selection; interval Borda rule; interval entropy; interval MULTIMOORA; multiple criteria decision making (MCDM)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501135, 71771156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we present an interval MULTIMOORA method with complete interval computation in which the interval distances of interval numbers and preference matrix are used. In addition, we propose a group interval best-worst method (BWM) with interval preference degree. The group interval BWM has a hierarchical structure of group decision making with two levels of experts. Beside employing the dominance theory to integrate subordinate rankings, we introduce the interval Borda rule as an aggregation function which does not have the defects of the dominance theory. We calculate the objective interval weights of criteria based on the interval entropy method, which are integrated by the subjective weights computed by the group interval BWM. The approach presented in this paper is verified by a real-world engineering selection problem of a hybrid vehicle engine based on real data and opinions of engineering design experts of the automotive industry of Iran. The preference-based and dominance-based ranking lists are presented for the problem. We solve the same case by employing the interval TOPSIS and VIKOR methods. Eventually, all resultant rankings are compared based on Spearman rank correlation coefficients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available