4.6 Article

Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Based on Adversarial Decomposition

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 753-764

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2872803

Keywords

Sociology; Statistics; Optimization; Convergence; Computer science; Evolutionary computation; Shape; Adversarial decomposition; evolutionary algorithm; many-objective optimization; stable matching theory

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) [9042038 (CityU 11205314)]
  2. ANR/RCC Joint Research Scheme through the Hong Kong RGC
  3. France National Research Agency [A-CityU101/16]
  4. Royal Society [IEC/NSFC/170243]
  5. Chinese National Science Foundation of China [61672443, 61473241]
  6. UKRI [MR/S017062/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm has become an increasingly popular choice for posterior multiobjective optimization. Facing the challenges of an increasing number of objectives, many techniques have been developed which help to balance the convergence and diversity. Nevertheless, according to a recent study by Ishibuchi et al., due to the predefined search directions toward the ideal point, their performance strongly depends on the Pareto front (PF) shapes, especially the orientation of the PFs. To balance the convergence and diversity for decomposition-based methods and to alleviate their performance dependence on the orientation of the PFs, this paper develops an adversarial decomposition method for many-objective optimization, which leverages the complementary characteristics of different subproblem formulations within a single paradigm. More specifically, two populations are co-evolved by two subproblem formulations with different contours and adversarial search directions. To avoid allocating redundant computational resources to the same region of the PF, the two populations are matched into one-to-one solution pairs according to their working regions upon the PF. Each solution pair can at most contribute one principal mating parent during the mating selection process. When comparing nine state-of-the-art many-objective optimizers, we have witnessed the competitive performance of our proposed algorithm on 130 many-objective test problems with various characteristics, including regular and inverted PFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available