4.8 Article

Ciliary Rab28 and the BBSome negatively regulate extracellular vesicle shedding

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50580

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK059418, DK116606]
  2. NIH Office of the Director [OD010943]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [11/PI/1037, 16/BBSRC/3394]
  4. BBSRC [16/BBSRC/3394]
  5. Irish Research Council Government of Ireland [GOIPG/2014/683]
  6. New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research [CSCR16FEL008]
  7. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [11/PI/1037, 16/BBSRC/3394] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  8. Irish Research Council (IRC) [GOIPG/2014/683] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cilia both receive and send information, the latter in the form of extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs are nano-communication devices that influence cell, tissue, and organism behavior. Mechanisms driving ciliary EV biogenesis are almost entirely unknown. Here, we show that the ciliary G-protein Rab28, associated with human autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy, negatively regulates EV levels in the sensory organs of Caenorhabditis elegans in a cilia specific manner. Sequential targeting of lipidated Rab28 to periciliary and ciliary membranes is highly dependent on the BBSome and the prenyl-binding protein phosphodiesterase 6 subunit delta (PDE6D), respectively, and BBSome loss causes excessive and ectopic EV production. We also find that EV defective mutants display abnormalities in sensory compartment morphogenesis. Together, these findings reveal that Rab28 and the BBSome are key in vivo regulators of EV production at the periciliary membrane and suggest that EVs may mediate signaling between cilia and glia to shape sensory organ compartments. Our data also suggest that defects in the biogenesis of cilia-related EVs may contribute to human ciliopathies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available