4.8 Editorial Material

Open exploration

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52157

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse [2016.0473]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH117772]
  3. National Science Foundation [1655839]
  4. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [756-2017-0766-SSHRC]
  5. National Institute on Drug Abuse [UH3DA041713]
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1655839] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arguments in support of open science tend to focus on confirmatory research practices. Here we argue that exploratory research should also be encouraged within the framework of open science. We lay out the benefits of 'open exploration' and propose two complementary ways to implement this with little infrastructural change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available