4.5 Article

Aerial spraying of bacterial insecticides to control spruce budworm defoliation leads to reduced carbon losses

Journal

ECOSPHERE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2988

Keywords

annual defoliation; Btk; forest protection; natural disturbance; net ecosystem productivity; TRIPLEX-insect

Categories

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec (FQRNT) program
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spruce budworm (SBW) outbreaks are a major natural disturbance in boreal forests of eastern North America. During large-scale infestations, aerial spraying of bacterial insecticides is used to suppress local high-density SBW populations. While the primary goal of spraying is the protection of wood volume for later harvest, it should also maintain carbon stored in trees. This study provides the first quantitative analysis of the efficacy of aerial spraying against SBW on carbon dynamics in balsam fir, spruce, and mixed fir-spruce forests. In this study, we used the TRIPLEX-Insect model to simulate carbon dynamics with and without spray applications in 14 sites of the boreal forest located in various regions of Quebec. We found that the efficacy of aerial spraying on reducing annual defoliation was greater in the early stage (<5 yr since the outbreak began) of the outbreak than in later (5-10 yr since the outbreak began) stage. Our results showed that more net ecosystem productivity is maintained in balsam fir (the most vulnerable species) than in either spruce or mixed fir-spruce forests following spraying. Also, average losses in aboveground biomass due to the SBW following spraying occurred more slowly than without spraying in balsam fir forests. Our findings suggest that aerial spraying could be used to maintain carbon in conifer forests during SBW disturbances, but that the efficacy of spray programs is affected by host species and stage of the SBW outbreak.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available