4.5 Article

A Multiscale Tiered Approach to Quantify Contributions: A Case Study of PM2.5 in South Korea During 2010-2017

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos11020141

Keywords

PM2.5; long-range transport; source-receptor relationship; receptor coverage; model horizontal grid resolution

Funding

  1. National Strategic Project-Fine Particle of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Environment (ME)
  3. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) in South Korea [2017M3D8A1092015]
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We estimated long-term foreign contributions to the particulate matter of 2.5 mu m or less in diameter (PM2.5) concentrations in South Korea with a set of air quality simulations. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)-Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE)-Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system was used to simulate the base and sensitivity case after a 50% reduction of foreign emissions. The effects of horizontal modeling grid resolutions (27- and 9-km) was also investigated. For this study, we chose PM2.5 in South Korea during 2010-2017 for the case study and emissions from China as a representative foreign source. The 9-km simulation results show that the 8-year average contribution of the Chinese emissions in 17 provinces ranged from 40-65%, which is similar to 4% lower than that from the 27-km simulation for the high-tier government segments (particularly prominent in coastal areas). However, for the same comparison for low-tier government segments (i.e., 250 prefectures), the 9-km simulation presented lowered the foreign contribution by up to 10% compared to that from the 27-km simulation. Based on our study results, we recommend using high-resolution modeling results for regional contribution analyses to develop an air quality action plan as the receptor coverage decreases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available