4.6 Article

Electrochemical Hydrogen Separation from Reformate Using High-Temperature Polybenzimidazole (PBI) Membranes: The Role of Chemistry

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages 6234-6242

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07037

Keywords

phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI); PPA process; PBI chemistry; electrochemical hydrogen separation; reformate; carbon monoxide

Funding

  1. BASF New Business

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various phosphoric acid (PA)-doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes, para-PBI, m/p-PBI, and meta-PBI, were prepared via the poly(phosphoric acid) (PPA) process. These three membranes showed high levels of PA (10-32 PA/PBI repeat unit (r.u.)) and proton conductivity (0.14-0.26 S/cm at 180 degrees C) as compared with a conventionally imbibed meta-PBI membrane (6 PA/PBI r.u. and 0.08 S/cm at 180 degrees C). By controlling chemistry and increasing the polymer solid content to similar to 18 wt %, m/p-PBI and meta-PBI membranes exhibited significantly improved creep resistance (<2 x 10(-6) Pa-1) compared to para-PBI (10 x 10(-)6 Pa-1). In this work, various chemistries of PBI have been investigated to understand how the chemistry affected the electrochemical hydrogen separation (EHS) performance, including voltage requirement, power consumption, efficiency, hydrogen purities, and also long-term durability of the MEAs. Reformate streams containing H-2, N-2, and CO were used to validate the increased utility of this technique when operating at 160-200 degrees C due to the increased Pt tolerance to CO. The EHS device based on PBI membranes synthesized via the PPA process can be operated using dilute hydrogen feed streams with large amounts of CO (13%), producing fairly pure hydrogen products (>99.6% with <0.4% nitrogen crossover and ppm levels of CO) with very high power efficiencies of up to similar to 72%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available