4.6 Article

Pilot Plant Reliability Metrics for Grinding and Fast Pyrolysis of Woody Residues

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 2793-2805

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06718

Keywords

Fast pyrolysis; Biomass preprocessing; Hydrotreatment upgrading; Integrated production; Pilot-scale operation; Process reliability

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08G028308]
  2. DOE Idaho Operations Office [DE-AC07-051D14517, DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  3. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technologies Office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we report on the effects of loblolly pine residue variability on material throughput, pilot plant uptime, operator intervention, product yield, and product quality for grinding, fast pyrolysis, and hydrotreating operations. Preprocessing throughput using a hammer mill varied between 31 and 48% of nameplate capacity (5 tons/h). Grinder overloads in the size reduction step were more prevalent for lower ash and higher moisture materials. Fast pyrolysis throughput varied between 57 and 72% of nameplate capacity (20 kg/h), and bio-oil yields varied between 46 and 53% (feedstock carbon to oil, dry basis). During fast pyrolysis operations, downtime was caused by bridging in the feed and char removal systems and plugging in the condensation system. Cohesion of feedstock and char leading to system plugging was less frequent for higher ash feedstocks, and differences in condenser plugging behavior between high and low ash feedstocks were observed. The catalyst stability of the bio-oil stabilization step was strongly dependent on the sulfur content in the bio-oil, which was higher for the high-ash residue oils. Lower moisture content in the starting biomass was consistent with lower sulfur content in bio-oil. Yields and properties of hydrotreated fuel products showed minimal deference among the bio-oils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available