4.6 Article

The Improvement of Pollutant Removal in the Ferric-Carbon Micro-Electrolysis Constructed Wetland by Partial Aeration

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12020389

Keywords

aeration; Ferric-Carbon Micro-Electrolysis; nitrogen removal; phosphorus removal; subsurface-flow constructed wetlands

Funding

  1. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects of 2019 Key RD Plans [2019JZZY010411]
  2. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018ZCO8N4]
  3. Doctoral Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BEE020]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [11440078614025]
  5. 64th Postdoc Science Foundation of China [2018M640633]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subsurface flow constructed wetland (SSFCW) has been applied for wastewater treatment for several decades. In recent years, the combination of ferric-carbon micro-electrolysis (Fe/C-M/E) and SSFCW was proven to be an effective method of multifarious sewage treatment. However, Ferric substrate created a relatively reductive condition, decreased the oxidation efficiency of NH4+-N, and blocked the following denitrification process, which led to the low removal efficiencies of NH4+-N and total nitrogen (TN). In this study, partial aeration was introduced into the ferric-carbon micro-electrolysis SSFCW (Fe/C-M/E CW) system to solve the problem above. The water quality and nitrogen-related functional genes of bacteria on the surface of substrate were measured for mechanism exploration. The results showed that, the removal efficiencies of NH4+-N and total phosphorus (TP) in an aerated Fe/C-M/E CW system were 96.97% +/- 6.06% and 84.62% +/- 8.47%, much higher than 43.33% +/- 11.27% and 60.16% +/- 2.95% in the unaerated Fe/C-M/E CW systems. However, the TN removal in Fe/C-M/E CW system was not enhanced by aeration, which could be optimized by extending more anoxic section for denitrification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available