4.7 Article

A Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Metric Extraction Tool for Forest Structure Modelling. Do Scan Angle and Radiometric Correction Matter?

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12020292

Keywords

LiDAR; software tool; processing tool; relative radiometric correction; forest fuel; understory vegetation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  2. FEDER [CGL2013-46387-C2-1-R, CGL2016-80705-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last decade, full-waveform airborne laser scanning (ALS(FW)) has proven to be a promising tool for forestry applications. Compared to traditional discrete airborne laser scanning (ALS(D)), it is capable of registering the complete signal going through the different vertical layers of the vegetation, allowing for a better characterization of the forest structure. However, there is a lack of ALS(FW) software tools for taking greater advantage of these data. Additionally, most of the existing software tools do not include radiometric correction, which is essential for the use of ALS(FW) data, since extracted metrics depend on radiometric values. This paper describes and presents a software tool named WoLFeX for clipping, radiometrically correcting, voxelizing the waves, and extracting object-oriented metrics from ALS(FW) data. Moreover, extracted metrics can be used as input for generating either classification or regression models for forestry, ecology, and fire sciences applications. An example application of WoLFeX was carried out to test the influence of the relative radiometric correction and the acquisition scan angle (1) on the ALS(FW) metric return waveform energy (RWE) values, and (2) on the estimation of three forest fuel variables (CFL: canopy fuel load, CH: canopy height, and CBH: canopy base height). Results show that radiometric differences in RWE values computed from different scan angle intervals (0 degrees-5 degrees and 15 degrees-20 degrees) were reduced, but not removed, when the relative radiometric correction was applied. Additionally, the estimation of height variables (i.e., CH and CBH) was not strongly influenced by the relative radiometric correction, while the model obtained for CFL improved from R-2 = 0.62 up to R-2 = 0.79 after applying the correction. These results show the significance of the relative radiometric correction for reducing radiometric differences measured from different scan angles and for modelling some stand-level forest fuel variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available