4.7 Article

Discrimination of Biological Scatterers in Polarimetric Weather Radar Data: Opportunities and Challenges

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12030545

Keywords

aeroecology; random forest; bio-scatterer classification; polarimetric weather radar

Funding

  1. Center of Excellence in Airport Technology (CEAT), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [12-G-015, 17-G-014]
  2. Federal Aviation Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation [12-G-015, 17-G-014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For radar aeroecology studies, the identification of the type of scatterer is critically important. Here, we used a random forest (RF) algorithm to develop a variety of scatterer classification models based on the backscatter values in radar resolution volumes of six radar variables (reflectivity, radial velocity, spectrum width, differential reflectivity, correlation coefficient, and differential phase) from seven types of biological scatterers and one type of meteorological scatterer (rain). Models that discriminated among fewer classes and/or aggregated similar types into more inclusive classes classified with greater accuracy and higher probability. Bioscatterers that shared similarities in phenotype tended to misclassify against one another more frequently than against more dissimilar types, with the greatest degree of misclassification occurring among vertebrates. Polarimetric variables proved critical to classification performance and individual polarimetric variables played central roles in the discrimination of specific scatterers. Not surprisingly, purposely overfit RF models (in one case study) were our highest performing. Such models have a role to play in situations where the inclusion of natural history can play an outsized role in model performance. In the future, bioscatter classification will become more nuanced, pushing machine-learning model development to increasingly rely on independent validation of scatterer types and more precise knowledge of the physical and behavioral properties of the scatterer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available