4.7 Article

Rheoacoustic Gels: Tuning Mechanical and Flow Properties of Colloidal Gels with Ultrasonic Vibrations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Region Auvergne-RhoneAlpes Pack Ambition Recherche Programme
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [258803]
  3. Labex TEC 21 (Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR-11-LABX-0030]
  4. PolyNat Carnot Institute (Investissements d'Avenir) [ANR-11-CARN-030-01]
  5. IDEX UGA program [ANR-15-IDEX-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colloidal gels, where nanoscale particles aggregate into an elastic yet fragile network, are at the heart of materials that combine specific optical, electrical, and mechanical properties. Tailoring the viscoelastic features of colloidal gels in real time thanks to an external stimulus currently appears as a major challenge in the design of smart soft materials. Here we introduce rheoacoustic gels, a class of materials that are sensitive to ultrasonic vibrations. By using a combination of rheological and structural characterization, we evidence and quantify a strong softening in three widely different colloidal gels submitted to ultrasonic vibrations (with submicron amplitude and frequency 20-500 kHz). This softening is attributed to micron-sized cracks within the gel network that may or may not fully heal once vibrations are turned off depending on the acoustic intensity. Ultrasonic vibrations are further shown to dramatically decrease the gel yield stress and accelerate shear-induced fluidization. Ultrasound-assisted fluidization dynamics appear to be governed by an effective temperature that depends on the acoustic intensity. Our work opens the way to a full control of elastic and flow properties by ultrasonic vibrations as well as to future theoretical and numerical modeling of such rheoacoustic gels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available