4.3 Article

Fibrin scaffolds embedded with sonic hedgehog/chitosan microspheres for recovery of spinal cord injury in rats

Journal

MATERIALS EXPRESS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 437-445

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/mex.2020.1654

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury; Sonic Hedgehog (SHH); Chitosan (CS) Microspheres; Fibrin Scaffold

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51403086, 81571830, 81501077]
  2. Jiangsu natural science foundation of China [BK20140544]
  3. Youth Talent Cultivation Program of Jiangsu University [4111280006]
  4. start-up support foundation of Jiangsu University [13JDG089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sonic hedgehog (SHH) has been shown to exert a protection on promoting the spinal cord injury (SCI) recovery, but it can't remain with its biological activity and sustained release at the injury site for long-term application. Herein, fibrin scaffolds embedded with SHH-loaded chitosan (CS) microspheres (SHH/CS) were synthesized and applied to provide protection and regeneration for complete transected spinal cord in rats. Characteristics of fibrin scaffolds embedded with SHH/CS microspheres, histological studies, immunohistochemistry staining, Western Blotting and recovery of motor function were conducted after implantation, respectively. Result showed that SHH maintained its biological activity and continued to act at the injury site, and the fibrin scaffolds embedded with SHH/CS microspheres could protect neurons and reduce apoptosis in the in vivo study, it also promoted some nerve fibers cross the spinal cord injury area. Moreover, the scaffolds improved partial motor function of double-hindlimb on a macro level. Overall, the fibrin scaffolds embedded with SHH/CS microspheres showed more satisfactory effect on nerve regeneration, tissue cavities prevention and motor function improvement, compared to fibrin scaffolds with SHH directly encapsulated into or fibrin scaffolds alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available