4.6 Article

Evaluation of soil flame disinfestation (SFD) for controlling weeds, nematodes and fungi

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 164-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62809-1

Keywords

soil flame disinfestation; weeds; pests control; soil properties; field application; sustainable

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0201600]
  2. Beijing Innovation Consortium of Agriculture Research System, China [BAIC01-2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil flame disinfestation (SFD) is a form of physical disinfestation that can be used both in greenhouses and on field crops. Its use for soil disinfestation in different crop growing conditions makes it increasingly attractive for controlling soilborne pathogens and weeds. But little is known about the effect on weeds and soilbrone diseases. This study reports on greenhouses and field crops in China that determined the efficacy of SFD to control weeds, nematodes and fungi. It also determined the impact of SFD on the soil physical and chemical properties (water content, bulk density, NO3--N content, NH4+-N content, conductivity and organic matter) in three field trials. A second generation SFD machine was used in these trials. SFD treatment significantly reduced weeds (>87.8%) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) (>98.1%). Plant height and crop yield was significantly increased with SFD treatment. NO3--N and NH4+-N increased after the SFD treatment, and there was also an increase in soil conductivity. Water content, bulk density and organic matter decreased significantly in the soil after the SFD treatment compared to the control. Soil flame disinfestation is a potential technique for controlling weeds and diseases in greenhouses or in fields. SFD is a non-chemical, safe, environmentally-friendly soil disinfection method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available