4.6 Article

UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the UK Earth System Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 4513-4558

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001739

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme - BEIS
  2. Defra
  3. National Environmental Research Council (NERC) National Capability Science Multi-Centre (NCSMC) [NE/N017978/1, NE/N018079/1, NE/N018036/1, NE/N01801X/1, NE/N017951/1]
  4. EU Horizon 2020 CRESCENDO project [641816]
  5. New Zealand government under the Strategic Science Investment Fund
  6. Deep South National Science Challenge
  7. Earth System and Climate Change Hub of the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme (NESP)
  8. NERC
  9. NCAS
  10. NERC [NE/N01801X/1, NE/N018036/1, NE/N017951/1, nceo020005, nceo020006, bas0100033, ncas10016] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We document the development of the first version of the U.K. Earth System Model UKESM1. The model represents a major advance on its predecessor HadGEM2-ES, with enhancements to all component models and new feedback mechanisms. These include a new core physical model with a well-resolved stratosphere; terrestrial biogeochemistry with coupled carbon and nitrogen cycles and enhanced land management; tropospheric-stratospheric chemistry allowing the holistic simulation of radiative forcing from ozone, methane, and nitrous oxide; two-moment, five-species, modal aerosol; and ocean biogeochemistry with two-way coupling to the carbon cycle and atmospheric aerosols. The complexity of coupling between the ocean, land, and atmosphere physical climate and biogeochemical cycles in UKESM1 is unprecedented for an Earth system model. We describe in detail the process by which the coupled model was developed and tuned to achieve acceptable performance in key physical and Earth system quantities and discuss the challenges involved in mitigating biases in a model with complex connections between its components. Overall, the model performs well, with a stable pre-industrial state and good agreement with observations in the latter period of its historical simulations. However, global mean surface temperature exhibits stronger-than-observed cooling from 1950 to 1970, followed by rapid warming from 1980 to 2014. Metrics from idealized simulations show a high climate sensitivity relative to previous generations of models: Equilibrium climate sensitivity is 5.4 K, transient climate response ranges from 2.68 to 2.85 K, and transient climate response to cumulative emissions is 2.49 to 2.66 K TtC(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available